<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Galvus review delayed</title>
	<link>http://pharmaweblog.com/blog/2006/11/13/galvus-fda-review/</link>
	<description>Pharmaceutical and biotech science and business</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Diabetes Mine - the all things diabetes blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Januvia: Is It &#8220;Oral Byetta&#8221; or Just a Lucky Break?</title>
		<link>http://pharmaweblog.com/blog/2006/11/13/galvus-fda-review/#comment-171</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pharmaweblog.com/blog/2006/11/13/galvus-fda-review/#comment-171</guid>
					<description>[...] It&amp;#8217;s looking like Merck got an incredibly lucky break here: Januvia sailed through FDA approvals and has come charging out of the gate with an &amp;#8220;enormously successful start&amp;#8221; (10% of new diabetic prescriptions). Meanwhile, its competitor from Novartis, Galvus, has been held up with the FDA for safety concerns. Hmmm&amp;#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It&#8217;s looking like Merck got an incredibly lucky break here: Januvia sailed through FDA approvals and has come charging out of the gate with an &#8220;enormously successful start&#8221; (10% of new diabetic prescriptions). Meanwhile, its competitor from Novartis, Galvus, has been held up with the FDA for safety concerns. Hmmm&#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pharma&#8217;s Cutting Edge &#187; Galvus follow-up</title>
		<link>http://pharmaweblog.com/blog/2006/11/13/galvus-fda-review/#comment-46</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pharmaweblog.com/blog/2006/11/13/galvus-fda-review/#comment-46</guid>
					<description>[...] When I reported on the initial Galvus approval delay in November, I promised a follow-up story.  Yesterday, Novartis reported that FDA took the action of granting the Galvus NDA approvable status.  Novartis had obviously expected this decision for a while, since label negotiations never occured, but the company chose to make the announcement after the decision was made official by FDA on the 23rd.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When I reported on the initial Galvus approval delay in November, I promised a follow-up story.  Yesterday, Novartis reported that FDA took the action of granting the Galvus <acronym title="New Drug Application (U.S.)">NDA</acronym> approvable status.  Novartis had obviously expected this decision for a while, since label negotiations never occured, but the company chose to make the announcement after the decision was made official by FDA on the 23rd.  [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.409 seconds -->
